Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hammond v. Meyer

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

December 11, 2013

LIONEL W. HAMMOND, Plaintiff,
v.
CONRAD
v.
MEYER, Director, Army Board for Correction of Military Records, Defendant.

ORDER

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a claim for review of the decisions of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records pursuant to 5 U.S.C. ยง 702. The case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

Defendant has filed an answer. Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, January 31, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned.

2. Each party is required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, if proceeding in propria persona, on his own behalf. Any party may appear at the status conference telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; a land line telephone number must be provided.

3. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before January 17, 2014, and defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before January 24, 2014. Each party's status report shall address all of the following matters:

a. Progress of service of process;
b. Possible joinder of additional parties;
c. Possible amendment of the pleadings;
d. Jurisdiction and venue;
e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;
f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including disclosure of expert witnesses;
g. Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial conference and trial;
h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the relative simplicity ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.