Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Mysin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

December 19, 2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
VALERI MYSIN, et al., Defendants.

HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, #122664 Federal Defender, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, #237432, Assistant Federal Defender, Designated Counsel for Service, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for Defendant, ANGELA SHAVLOVSKY.

JOHN DUREE JR., Attorney for VALERI MYSIN

JOSEPH WISEMAN, Attorney for ALEXANDER KOKHANETS

DINA SANTOS, Attorney for MICHAEL KENNEDY,

JULIA YOUNG, Attorney for BORIS MURZAK,

JULIA YOUNG, Attorney for ZINAIDA MURZAK.

JOHN BALAZS, Attorney for VITALIY TUZMAN,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney.

LEE BICKLEY, Assistant U.S. Attorney.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through, LEE BICKLEY, Assistant U.S. Attorney, defendant, ANGELA SHAVLOVSKY by and through her counsel, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender, JOHN DUREE JR., attorney for VALERI MYSIN, DINA SANTOS, attorney for MICHAEL KENNEDY, JOSEPH WISEMAN, attorney for ALEXANDER KOKHANETS, JULIA YOUNG, attorney for BORIS MURZAK, and attorney for ZINAIDA MURZAK, and JOHN BALAZS, attorney for VITALIY TUZMAN, that the status conference set for Tuesday, December 17, 2013, be continued to Tuesday, March 18, 2014, at 9:15 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendants, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

The parties agree that the requested continuance is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The parties agree that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, and they ask the Court to exclude time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act from the date of this stipulation, December 12, 2013, through ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.