Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Thr California L.P. v. Taylor

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

December 20, 2013

THR CALIFORNIA, L.P., Plaintiff,
v.
STEVE TAYLOR, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

Defendants, proceeding pro se, removed the above-entitled action from state court. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On November 13, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on defendants and which contained notice to defendants that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 13, 2013 are adopted in full; and

2. The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin, Lodi Judicial Branch.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.