January 6, 2014
RON DAVIS, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,
VISA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.
RICHARD B. GOETZ (S.B. #115666), JACLYN A. BLANKENSHIP (S.B. #267524), O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, Los Angeles, CA, MATTHEW D. POWERS (S.B. #212682), O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant, VISA, INC.
CHARLES D. MARSHALL, MARSHALL LAW FIRM, Walnut Creek, CA, Attorney for Plaintiff, RON DAVIS.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER L.R. 6-2
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Ron Davis ("Plaintiff") filed his Complaint in the above-entitled action on November 4, 2013;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the summons and Complaint on Defendant Visa, Inc. ("Defendant") on November 7, 2013;
WHEREAS, Defendant and Plaintiff filed a Joint Stipulation on November 22, 2013 to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the initial Complaint to January 8, 2014. (Dkt. No. 07.) The Joint Stipulation also noted that Plaintiff intended to file an amended complaint on or about December 9, 2013;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed and served his First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in the above-entitled action on December 16, 2013;
WHEREAS, according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Defendant has until January 8, 2014 to respond to Plaintiff's FAC;
WHEREAS, under this agreement and pursuant to L.R. 6-2, Defendant and Plaintiff (the "Parties") have met and conferred regarding a briefing schedule, and due to scheduling difficulties, such as demands in other matters, the holidays, and scheduled vacation plans, the Parties have agreed to the following briefing schedule in order to accommodate such scheduling conflicts:
Defendant's new deadline to file a motion to dismiss, or otherwise respond, to Plaintiff's FAC shall be January 15, 2014;
Plaintiff's deadline to file an Opposition shall be February 14, 2014;
Defendant's deadline to file a Reply shall be February 28, 2014;
WHEREAS, there have been no other extensions, either through Joint Stipulations or Court Orders regarding a response to Plaintiff's FAC;
WHEREAS, this change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order, including the meet and confer and filings regarding ADR on January 14, 2014; the filing of the Rule 26(f) Report on January 28, 2014; or the Initial Case Management Conference on February 4, 2014 at 1:30 P.M.;
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 6-2 of the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, it is hereby stipulated by and among Plaintiff and Defendant and through their counsel of record that Defendant shall file its motion to dismiss, or otherwise respond, to Plaintiff's FAC on January 15, 2014, Plaintiff shall file his Opposition on February 14, 2014, and Defendant shall file its Reply on February 28, 2014.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
The Court having considered the Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Set Briefing
Schedule for Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint under L.R. 6-2 submitted by the parties, and good cause appearing:
1. The Stipulation is approved;
2. Defendant shall have until January 15, 2014, to file its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint;
3. Plaintiff shall have until February 14, 2014, to file any Opposition; and
4. Defendant shall have until February 28, 2014, to file any Reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.