Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Radcliffe

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

January 6, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
CHRISTEPHER JAMES RADCLIFFE, Defendant.

DETENTION ORDER (Violation of Pretrial Release, Probation or Supervised Release)

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

[] After a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148 (violation of pretrial release order), the court finds:

[] there is probable cause to believe the person has committed a federal, state or local crime while on release and defendant has not rebutted the presumption that his release will endanger another or the community or
[] there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated another condition of release and
[] based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) there is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure that the defendant will not flee or pose a danger to the safety of another person or the community or
[] the person is unlikely to abide by any condition or combination of conditions of release. F.R.Cr.P. 32.1(a)(D), 46(c), 18 U.S.C. § 3148.

[X] After a hearing pursuant to F.R.Cr.P. 32.1(a)(6) and 46(c) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (violation of probation or supervised release) the court finds there is probable cause to believe defendant has violated a condition of probation or supervised release and the defendant has not met his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he will not flee or pose a danger to another person or to the community. 18 U.S.C. § 3143.

IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4) defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with his counsel. Upon further order of a court of the United States or request of an attorney for the United States the person in charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.