Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gens v. Colonial Savings, F.A.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

January 10, 2014

LAURA ANN GENS and TIMOTHY GENS, Plaintiffs,
v.
COLONIAL SAVINGS, F.A.; ASSOCIATED BANK, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF DEFENDANT ASSOCIATED BANK, N.A. TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; CONTINUING MOTIONS TO DISMISS BY COLONIAL SAVINGS, F.A. AND MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. [Re Docket Nos. 100, 101, 102]

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge

Plaintiffs Laura A. Gens and Timothy Gens (collectively "Gens"), bring the instant action against defendants, Colonial Savings, F.A., Associated Bank, N.A., and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS"). In the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), Gens asserts nine causes of action against defendants arising under federal and state law. Dkt. No. 98 (SAC).

Colonial, MERS, and Associated each filed a motion to dismiss (MTD) or strike the SAC on December 2, 2013. See Dkt. Nos. 100 (Colonial MTD), 101 (MERS MTD), 102 (Associated MTD). Colonial and MERS sent a nearly illegible copy of their motions to the Gens, and are required to reserve the motion today. Gens will serve an opposition on Colonial and MERS by January 29, 2014. The court will address these motions on the papers after receipt. With regard to Associated's MTD, Gens responded on December 19, 2013, as required by the Local Rules. See Dkt. Nos. 109, 110; Civ. Local Rule 5-5(a)(2).

The court previously issued an order dismissing most of Gens' claims-some with prejudice. See Dkt. No. 85 (Order). The court granted Gens leave to amend certain claims, and Gens then filed a SAC with minimal changes and failed to remove the claims dismissed with prejudice. The claims previously dismissed with prejudice are struck from the complaint.[1] The court briefly addresses the remaining claim against Associated.

A. Seventh Cause of Action: Wisconsin Deceptive Trade Practices Act against Associated

The court previously dismissed Gens' cause of action based on the Wisconsin Deceptive Trade Practices Act because Gens failed to allege any fraudulent representations with specificity even though the claim sounded in fraud. Dkt. No. 85, Order at 9. The claim was based on the allegation that "Associated and MERS failed to undergo a diligent underwriting process, properly adjust and disclose facts and a circumstance relating to" Gens' mortgage and that they "would add outrageous fees, costs, charges etc. while concealing these fees/charges." Dkt. No. 56, FAC ¶ 63. The court also found the claim was untimely. Id .; see Wis.Stat. § 100.18(11)(b)(3) (three year statute of limitations).

Gens' current claim under the Wisconsin Deceptive Trade Practices Act is that the July 22, 2010 assignment from MERS to Colonial was fraudulent and that an Associated employee made some fraudulent statements about the principal amount owed in 2006. SAC ¶¶ 68, 69, 71. Gens claims that Associated knowingly participated in the 2010 fraud, but there is no support for this other than vague allegations about statements an Associated representative made in an unrelated 2006 phone call. Accordingly, the claim against Associated is dismissed for failure to allege the claim with specificity and for being untimely.

ORDER

For the reasons explained above, the court orders as follows with respect to each of the causes of action at issue:

• First Cause of Action - Quiet Title: struck from SAC.
• Second Cause of Action - Rescission of the Loan: struck from SAC.
• Third Cause of Action - Rescission of the 2008 Settlement Agreement: struck from SAC.
• Fourth Cause of Action - Trespass against Colonial: pending ruling on motion to dismiss.
• Fifth Cause of Action - Conversion against Colonial: pending ruling on ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.