ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Petitioner Shawn Paul Hedlin ("Petitioner"), a state prisoner, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his conviction and sentence for first degree murder, attempted murder, false imprisonment, first degree burglary, and unlawful possession of a firearm. ECF No. 1 ("Petition"). The Court hereby ORDERS Respondent Ron Barnes ("Respondent") to show cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted.
A. Standard of Review
This Court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus "on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States." 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); Rose v. Hodges, 423 U.S. 19, 21 (1975). A district court shall "award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto." 28 U.S.C. § 2243.
B. Petitioner's Claims
As grounds for habeas relief, Petitioner claims that the prosecutor engaged in prosecutorial misconduct at trial by eliminating jurors on the basis of race, and also by introducing gang evidence in violation of the state trial court's order on motions in limine. Petition at 1. He seeks an order reversing his conviction and ordering a new trial. Id. at 31. Liberally construed, Petitioner's claims are sufficient to require a response. The Court thus orders Respondent to show cause why the petition should not be granted.
1. The Clerk shall serve by mail a copy of this order, Petitioner's Petition (ECF No. 1) and all attachments thereto upon the Respondents. The Clerk shall also serve a copy of this order on Petitioner.
2. Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner, within ninety days of the date this order is filed, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. Respondent shall file with the answer and serve on Petitioner a copy of all portions of the underlying state criminal record that have been transcribed previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the petition.
If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the Court and serving it on Respondent within thirty days of the date the answer is filed.
3. Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases within ninety days of the date this order is filed. If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on Respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty days of the date the motion is filed, and Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fifteen days of the date any opposition is filed.
4. It is Petitioner's responsibility to prosecute this case. Petitioner is reminded that all communications with the Court must be served on Respondent by mailing a true copy of the document to Respondent's counsel. Petitioner must keep the Court and all parties informed of any change of address by filing a separate paper captioned "Notice of Change of Address." He must comply with the Court's orders in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may ...