Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

January 16, 2014

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
v.
AU Optronics Corp., et al., State of Oregon MDL No. 1927

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP, James G. Kreissman (SBN 206740), Harrison J. Frahn IV (SBN 206822), Jason M. Bussey (SBN 227185), Elizabeth A. Gillen (SBN 260667), Melissa D. Schmidt (SBN 266487), Palo Alto, California, Attorneys for Defendant HannStar Display Corp.

NOSSAMAN LLP, Christopher A. Nedeau (SBN 81297), Carl L. Blumenstein (SBN 124158), Farschad Farzan (SBN 215194), Natasha A. Saggar Sheth (SBN 282896), San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendants AU Optronics Corp. and AU Optronics Corporation America.

WHITE & CASE LLP, Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice), Martin M. Toto (pro hac vice), John H. Chung (pro hac vice), Kristen J. McAhren (pro hac vice), New York, NY, Attorneys for Toshiba Corp.; Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.; Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.; and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP, John M. Grenfell (SBN 88500), Jacob R. Sorensen (SBN 209134), Fusae Nara (pro hac vice), Andrew D. Lanphere (SBN 191479), San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Sharp Corp. and Sharp Electronics Corp.

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP, Robert D. Wick, Neil K. Roman, Derek Ludwin, Washington, DC, Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.

PAUL HASTINGS LLP, Holly A. House (SBN 136045), Kevin C. McCann (SBN 120874), Lee F. Berger (SBN 222756), Sean Unger (SBN 231694), San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.

DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP, Neal A. Potischman (SBN 254862), Christopher B. Hockett (SBN 121539), Sandra West Neukom (SBN 250389), Samantha H. Knox (SBN 254427), Menlo Park, California, Counsel for Defendants Chi Mei Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.), Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech Inc. and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.

MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Kent M. Roger (SBN 95987), Herman J. Hoying (SBN 257495), San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. (n/k/a Japan Display Inc.) and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP, Melvin R. Goldman (SBN 34097), Stephen P. Freccero (SBN 131093), Derek F. Foran (SBN 224569), San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

HAGLUND KELLEY JONES & WILDER, LLP, Michael E. Haglund, OSB No. 77203 (Pro Hac Vice), Michel K. Kelley, OSB No. 85378 (Pro Hac Vice), Special Assistant Attorneys General, Portland, OR, Tim D. Nord, OSB No. 882800 Oregon Senior Assistant Attorney General Salem, OR, Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Oregon.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING REVISED STATE OF OREGON DEADLINES

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

WHEREAS the above-captioned case has been proceeding with pretrial preparation in accordance with the Court's Order dated October 1, 2103 (Dkt. No. 8639) and the deadline for close of limited fact discovery unique to the State of Oregon case is presently November 15, 2013;

WHEREAS Special Master Martin Quinn ordered on November 4, 2013 that close of fact discovery be extended to January 15, 2014;

WHEREAS counsel for the State of Oregon and counsel for defendants in the State of Oregon case believe additional time is needed to complete fact discovery unique to the case;

WHEREAS an extension of deadlines in the State of Oregon case will not prejudice any of the parties or the Court because trial dates have not been scheduled for the case;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the State of Oregon and defendants' liaison counsel, and subject to the concurrence of the Court, that the State of Oregon case will adopt the following schedule:

Current Date (pursuant Event to 10/1/13 Order) Revised Date Close of limited fact discovery unique November 15, 2013 March 14, 2014 to State of Oregon case Service of opening expert reports for December 6, 2013 April 18, 2014 plaintiffs Service of underlying data and Code December 13, 2013 April 25, 2014 Service of opposition expert Reports March 7, 2014 July 24, 2014 Service of underlying data and Code March 14, 2014 July 31, 2014 Plaintiffs and Defendants to Serve Proposed List of Summary Judgment March 31, 2014 August 7, 2014 Motions (Copies to be Provided to the Court) Plaintiffs and Defendants to Meet and Confer Over Proposed List of March 31, 2014 August 7-August 14, 2014 Summary Judgment Motions and April 4, 2014 Schedule for Same

Plaintiffs and Defendants to File with the Court Joint List of Proposed Summary Judgment Motions and April 25, 2014 August 21, 2014 Proposed Schedule for Summary Judgment Filings Service of reply expert reports May 9, 2014 September 23, 2014 Service of underlying data and Code May 16, 2014 September 30, 2014 Close of expert discovery June 13, 2014 October 31, 2014 Last Day to File Supplemental List of Proposed Summary Judgment Motions Based Upon New June 13, 2014 October 31, 2014 Information or Issues Raised in the Reply Expert Reports Last day to file dispositive Motions July 11, 2014 December 10, 2014 Last day to file oppositions to August 22, 2014 January 23, 2014 dispositive motions Last day to file reply briefs in support October 3, 2014 March 3, 2015 of dispositive motions Last day for hearing dispositive October 17, 2014 March 27, 2015 motions

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.