Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

January 24, 2014

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
v.
LG Electronics, Inc.; LG Electronics USA, Inc.; Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc.; Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc.; Koninklijke Philips NV.; Lite-On IT Corporation of Taiwan; BenQ Corporation; Philips BenQ Digital Storage; BenQ America Corporation; Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation; Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc.; Pioneer Corporation; Pioneer North America, Inc.; Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc.; Pioneer High Fidelity Taiwan Co., Ltd.; Sharp Corporation; and Pioneer Digital Design & Manufacturing Company, Defendants. This Document relates to: Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff, No. 3:13-cv-5371-RS

BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP, Lester C. Houtz, Karma M. Giulianelli, Andre M. Pauka, Daniel R. Brody, Denver, CO, BARTLIT BECK HERMAN PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP, Mark E. Ferguson, Chicago, IL, Attorneys for Plaintiff Hewlett-Packard Company.

EIMER STAHL LLP, Nathan P. Eimer, Attorneys for Defendants, LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc.

ROPES & GRAY LLP, Mark S. Popofsky, Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. and Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc.

BAKER BOTTS LLP, John M. Taladay, Attorneys for Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V.; Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation; Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc.; Lite-On It Corporation of Taiwan.

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP, Joel B. Kleinman, Attorneys for Defendants, BenQ Corporation and BenQ America Corporation.

JONES DAY, Eric P. Enson, Attorneys for Defendants, Pioneer North America, Inc.; Pioneer, Electronics (USA) Inc.; Pioneer Corporation, and Pioneer High Fidelity Taiwan Co., Ltd.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

STIPULATION

It is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, by their respective attorneys, that:

1. Undersigned Counsel of EIMER STAHL LLP agree to accept service of the complaint in Hewlett-Packard Co. v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-05371-RS, on behalf of Defendants LG Electronics, Inc. ("LG Electronics") and LG Electronics USA, Inc. ("LG Electronics USA"). LG Electronics and LG Electronics USA shall have until Thursday, April 17, 2014 to file a response thereto.

2. Undersigned Counsel of ROPES & GRAY LLP agree to accept service of the complaint in Hewlett-Packard Co. v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-05371-RS, on behalf of Defendants Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. ("HLDS") and Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc. ("HLDS Korea"). HLDS and HLDS Korea shall have until Thursday, April 17, 2014 to file a response thereto.

3. Undersigned Counsel of BAKER BOTTS LLP agree to accept service of the complaint in Hewlett-Packard Co. v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-05371-RS, on behalf of Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc., and Lite-On IT Corporation of Taiwan (collectively, the "PLDS Defendants"). The PLDS Defendants shall have until Thursday, April 17, 2014 to file a response thereto.

4. Undersigned Counsel of DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP agree to accept service of the complaint in Hewlett-Packard Co. v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-05371-RS, on behalf of Defendants BenQ Corporation and BenQ America Corp. (collectively, the "BenQ Defendants"). The BenQ Defendants shall have until Thursday, April 17, 2014 to file a response thereto.

5. Undersigned Counsel of JONES DAY agree to accept service of the complaint in Hewlett-Packard Co. v. LG Electronics, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:13-cv-05371-RS, on behalf of Defendants Pioneer Corporation, Pioneer North America, Inc., Pioneer Electronics (USA) Inc., Pioneer High Fidelity Taiwan Co., Ltd., and Pioneer Digital Design & Manufacturing Company (collectively, the "Pioneer Defendants"). The Pioneer Defendants shall have until Thursday, April 17, 2014 to file a response thereto.

6. This Stipulation does not constitute a waiver by Defendants of any defense, including but not limited to those defenses provided under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

7. To the extent any Defendant or Defendants move to dismiss the Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or otherwise, the parties shall work in good faith to reach an agreed-upon briefing schedule that they shall present to the Court no later than Thursday, May 1, 2014, but in no event shall Hewlett-Packard's response to any such motion(s) be due before Monday, June 16, 2014.

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

/s/Lester C. Houtz

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.