ORDER REGARDING CASE STATUS AND DIRECTING CLERK TO RE-ISSUE SUMMONS AND IFP PACKAGE
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge.
Scha Buck Larson is currently incarcerated at the California Institution for Men in Chino, California. (Doc. No. 6.) Mr. Larson is proceeding pro se and has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1.) Mr. Larson alleges violations of his constitutional rights during his arrest by San Diego police officers in November 2011. (Id. at 1-2.)
On December 12, 2013, the Court granted Mr. Larson leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (Doc. No. 4 at 2.) Finding his Complaint sufficient to survive the initial screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A, the Court directed the Clerk to issue a summons upon Defendants and ordered the U.S. Marshal to effect service of Mr. Larson's Complaint pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 4(c)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). (Id. at 2-4.)
On the same day, the Clerk issued the summons on Mr. Larson's Complaint, prepared an "IFP package, " including certified copies of Mr. Larson's Complaint, a U.S. Marshal Form 285 ("USM Form 285") for each Defendant named in the Complaint, and a copy of the Court's Order granting Mr. Larson leave to proceed IFP, and mailed them to Mr. Larson for completion. (Doc. No. 5.)
On December 26, 2013, Mr. Larson filed a Notice of Change of Address, indicating he had been transferred from Kern Valley State Prison to Richard J. Donovan State Prison (Doc. No. 6). Mr. Larson's change of address did not indicate the date of his transfer, but it stated that Mr. Larson had not received summons forms. On January 17, 2014, Mr. Larson filed another letter stating that he had not received summons forms. (Doc. No. 7.)
Based on these filings, the Court concludes that the IFP package mailed to Mr. Larson on December 12, 2013 never reached him.
FED.R.CIV.P. 4 Service Rules
Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that "if a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court-on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff-must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order than service be made within a specific time." FED.R.CIV.P. 4(m).
In cases like this one, involving a plaintiff who has been granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), a United States Marshal, upon order of the court, serves the summons and the complaint. FED.R.CIV.P. 4(c)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (in IFP proceedings, "[t]he officers of the court shall issue and serve all process, and perform all duties in such cases."). "[A]n incarcerated pro se plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis is entitled to rely on the U.S. Marshal for service of the summons and complaint.'" Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir. 1994) (quoting Puett, 912 F.2d at 275), abrogated on other grounds by Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472 (1995).
Thus, in the interests of justice and in order to facilitate the completion of U.S. Marshal service in this matter, the Court finds good cause to re-issue the materials necessary to serve Defendants. See In re Sheehan, 253 F.3d 507, 513 (9th Cir. 2001).
Conclusion and Order
Accordingly, the ...