Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Moses

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit

January 28, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
HEATHER MOSES, Defendant,

Jared Dolan, Assistant United States Attorney.

SCOTT N. CAMERON, (SBN 226605), Attorney at Law, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for HEATHER MOSES.

STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant HEATHER MOSES, by and through her counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on January 30, 2014, at 9:30 a.m.

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until March 20, 2014, at 9:30 a.m., and to exclude time between January 30, 2014, and March 20, 2014, under Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a. The government has produced approximately 2, 500 pages of discovery to the defense.

b. Defense counsel desires additional time to review the document discovery, consult with his client regarding the discovery, conduct investigation, and to discuss potential resolution with his client and the government.

c. The parties have been involved in negotiations which have been fruitful and the parties desire additional time to conclude those negotiations.

d. Counsel for each defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny defendants the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

e. The government does not object to the continuance.

f. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.

g. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of January 30, 2014, to March 20, 2014, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

(THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.