Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mulligan v. Nichols

United States District Court, C.D. California

January 30, 2014

BRIAN C. MULLIGAN, an individual, Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES NICHOLS, an individual; JOHN MILLER, an individual; THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, an entity; TYLER IZEN, an individual; LOS ANGELES POLICE PROTECTIVE LEAGUE, a corporation, and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants.

DAVID C. SCHEPER, ALEXANDER H. COTE, ANGELA M. MACHALA, AMOS A. LOWDER, SCHEPER KIM & HARRIS LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Los Angeles Police Protective League and Tyler Izen.

JUDGMENT

R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

For good cause showing, the Court enters judgment in favor of defendants the Los Angeles Police Protective League and its president, Tyler Izen (collectively "LAPPL") Plaintiff Brian Mulligan's Sixth Cause of Action on the grounds that:

1. Plaintiff has not raised a genuine issue of fact with respect to LAPPL's right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to issue the press release and disclose the recording.

2. Plaintiff has not raised a genuine issue of fact with respect to LAPPL's right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to disclose the recording - a public record.

3. Plaintiff has not raised a genuine issue of fact with respect to LAPPL's alleged conspiracy or joint action with any state actor under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code.

4. Plaintiff has not raised a genuine issue of fact with respect to a compensable injury under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.