Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. Global Asylum Inc.

United States District Court, C.D. California

February 6, 2014

WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., a Delaware corporation; NEW LINE CINEMA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; NEW LINE PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation; METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS INC., a Delaware corporation; and THE SAUL ZAENTZ COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs,
v.
THE GLOBAL ASYLUM INC. (aka The Asylum), a California corporation, Defendant.

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, District Judge.

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, in accordance with the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment of Permanent Injunction entered into and filed herewith by plaintiffs Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., New Line Cinema LLC, New Line Productions, Inc. (together with New Line Cinema LLC, "New Line"), Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc., and The Saul Zaentz Company (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and defendant The Global Asylum Inc. ("Asylum"), through their respective undersigned counsel of record in this action, the Court HEREBY FINDS THAT:

1. Subject to various agreements among them, Plaintiffs own exclusive rights to produce and distribute motion pictures based on the classic literary works of Professor J.R.R. Tolkien entitled The Lord of the Rings, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King (known as the " Lord of the Rings trilogy"), and The Hobbit , fantasy stories that follow the adventures of fictional creatures called "hobbits."

2. New Line created, released and distributed three motion pictures based on the Lord of the Rings trilogy in 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively (the " Lord of the Rings Films").

3. Plaintiffs have developed, produced, and distributed in the United States and in other territories worldwide the motion picture The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey , which is the first of three films to be released by Plaintiffs based on the novel The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien (the " Hobbit Films"). The other two Hobbit Films are entitled The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (released theatrically in December 2013) and The Hobbit: There and Back Again (scheduled for theatrical release in December 2014).

4. Defendant The Global Asylum, Inc. has represented that it has acted as exclusive sales agent for a motion picture starring Christopher Judge and Bai Ling entitled Age of the Hobbits , which was developed, produced, and distributed by The Institution LLC (the "Asylum Motion Picture"). The Asylum Motion Picture was scheduled for release on December 11, 2012, was distributed to retailers under that title, and also has been distributed under the titles Lord of the Elves and Clash of the Empires.

5. On November 7, 2012, Plaintiffs filed this Action alleging, among other things, that they own exclusive trademark rights in the terms "Hobbit" and "Hobbits" (the "Hobbit Marks") and in the titles of the Hobbit Films, and that Asylum's sale, marketing, packaging, and promotion of the Asylum Motion Picture constitute trademark infringement, false designation of origin, unfair competition, and false advertising under the federal Lanham Act, and unfair competition and false advertising under California law.

6. On November 28, 2012, Asylum filed a counterclaim against Plaintiffs in the Action for a declaration of trademark non-infringement, and on December 3, 2012, Asylum filed an answer to Plaintiffs' complaint in the Action. Plaintiffs filed an answer to Asylum's counterclaim on December 18, 2012.

7. On December 10, 2012, the Court entered an order that temporarily restrained the advertising, sale, and distribution by Asylum of any motion picture under the title Age of the Hobbits or any other title confusingly similar to the Hobbit Marks, pending a hearing on an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. On January 29, 2013, the district court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting Asylum's use of the Hobbit Marks in conjunction with the Asylum Motion Picture. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the grant of a preliminary injunction on October 20, 2013.

8. Plaintiffs and Asylum have entered into a confidential settlement agreement and have stipulated to the entry by the Court of this Judgment for Permanent Injunction on the terms set forth below (the "Permanent Injunction").

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES THAT:

A. Pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Asylum, its respective parent, subsidiary and affiliated companies, together with its respective officers, directors, principals, owners, partners, managers, shareholders, agents, attorneys, employees, representatives, successors, assigns, transferees, and all persons acting in concert or participation with them, or at their direction, or within their control, shall be permanently enjoined and restrained from engaging in any of the following:
1. Manufacturing, producing, labeling, selling, distributing, licensing, sub-licensing, assigning, marketing, promoting, or advertising the Asylum Motion Picture in any manner that:
a. uses the titles Age of the Hobbits, Lord of the Elves, or any other title that includes the words "Hobbit, " "Hobbits, " "Tolkien" or any variation of those words or the titles of any of the Lord of the Rings Films or Hobbit Films (or any similar variations thereof), or the proper name of any of the characters, places, items, or events in the Lord of the Rings novels ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.