Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Offield v. Holder

United States District Court, N.D. California

February 6, 2014

DANIEL J. OFFIELD, Plaintiff,
v.
ERIC HOLDER; ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusively, Defendants.

LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD P. MARGARITA RICHARD P. MARGARITA, Sloughhouse, California, Attorney for Plaintiff DANIEL J. OFFIELD.

MELINDA HAAG, United States Attorney, ALEX G. TSE, Chief, Civil Division, JENNIFER S. WANG, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Federal Defendant.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; BRIEFING

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Inasmuch as counsel for plaintiff has been ill and unable to attend to his caseload, the parties, through their counsel, and at the request of plaintiff, stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, currently calendared to be heard on March 6, 2014, will instead be heard on March 20, 2014;
2. Plaintiff's Opposition will be due by February 20, 2014;
3. Defendant's Reply will be due by March 6, 2014.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation and good cause having been shown, it is ordered that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment will be calendared to be heard on March 20, 2014; plaintiff's Opposition will be filed by February 20, 2014; and defendant's Reply will be filed by March 6, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.