Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Northern California Glaziers, Architectural M and Glass Workers Pension Trust Fund v. Ledeit & Sons Glass, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California

February 11, 2014

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GLAZIERS, ARCHITECTURAL M AND GLASS WORKERS PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
LEDEIT & SONS GLASS, INC. a California corporation, Defendant.

Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509), Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607), SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Maria Anastas, Esq. (SBN 229787), Brooke S. Purcell, Esq. (SBN260058), OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant.

JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

Plaintiffs and Defendants both respectfully request that the Case Management Conference scheduled for February 20, 2014, at 3:00 p.m., be continued for sixty (60) days, as follows:

1. As the Court's records will reflect, this action was filed on November 30, 2013 (Dkt. #1) to compel Defendant's compliance with its collective bargaining agreement in relation to amounts found due on an audit of its payroll records for the period of January 1, 2010 through March 31, 2013. Plaintiffs requested a further audit be performed for the period April 1, 2013 through the present. Service on Defendant was effectuated on November 21, 2013. A Proof of Service of Summons was filed with the Court (Dkt. #8). Defendant filed an Answer to the Complaint on December 26, 2013 (Dkt. #13).

2. The parties have met and conferred, and are working toward an informal resolution. Plaintiffs' auditors are in the process of completing an audit of Defendant's records. The parties intend to wait until the audit is complete, review it, and discuss any objections to the contents with the goal of resolving this matter without Court intervention.

3. Plaintiffs and Defendants herein respectfully request that the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for February 20, 2014, be continued for forty-five (45) to sixty (60) days to allow the completion of the audit of Defendant's records and to allow the parties to discuss the audit and other conditions of settlement.

4. There are no issues that need to be addressed by this Court at the currently scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court's time and resources, both parties respectfully request that the Court continue the currently scheduled Case Management Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case Management Conference is hereby continued to _______________, and all related deadlines are extended accordingly.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.