Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Google Inc. v. Eolas Technologies Incorporated

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

February 17, 2014

GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff,
v.
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED; and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendants.

PARKER C. ANKRUM (SBN: 261608), REBECCA UNRUH (SBN: 267881), KEITH J. MITRO (SBN: 287108), KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP, Redwood Shores, CA.

JEFFREY J. TONEY (pro hac vice), JONATHAN K. WALDROP (pro hac vice), DARCY L. JONES (pro hac vice), KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP, Atlanta, GA, Attorneys for Plaintiff, GOOGLE INC.

COURTLAND L. REICHMAN (SBN: 268873), MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C., Redwood Shores, CA, Attorneys for Defendants, EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED; and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA.

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR GOOGLE INC. TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Google Inc. ("Google") and Defendants Eolas Technologies Incorporated and The Regents of the University of California (collectively, "Defendants") hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows:

WHEREAS, on January 2, 2014 and January 3, 2014, Google served its complaint upon Defendants;

WHEREAS, on January 22, 2014, at the request of Defendants, the parties agreed to mutual 14 day extensions for Defendants to respond to Google's complaint and for Google to respond to Defendants' pleadings or response to Google's complaint to which a response is allowed;

WHEREAS, on January 24, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Google's complaint to February 7, 2014;

WHEREAS, on January 24, 2014, this Court granted the parties stipulation;

WHEREAS, on February 7, 2014, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction in response to Google's complaint;

WHEREAS, Google's response to Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is due February 21, 2014;

WHEREAS, Defendants' reply is due February 28, 2014; and

WHEREAS, this Court has set a hearing on Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction for March 20, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.

NOW THEREFORE the parties through their undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and request that the Court grant, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 that:

• The time to file Google's opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction be extended until March 7, 2014;
• The time to file the Defendants' reply to Google's opposition be extended until March 14, 2014; and
• The hearing for the Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction be noticed for April 3, 2014, or as soon thereafter at the Court's convenience.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

I hereby attest pursuant to L.R. 5.1(i)(3) that concurrence in the electronic filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, orders as follows:

• The time to file Google's opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction be extended until March 7, 2014;
• The time to file the Defendants' reply to Google's opposition be extended until March 14, 2014; and
• The hearing for the Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction be noticed for April 3, 2014, or as soon thereafter at the Court's convenience.

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.