Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mulligan v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

February 20, 2014

DENIS MULLIGAN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,
v.
IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LARRY HSU and ARTHUR A. KOCH Defendants. HAVERHILL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,
v.
IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LARRY HSU, and ARTHUR A. KOCH Defendants.

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP, Peter A. Wald (Bar No. 85705), Marcy C. Priedeman (Bar No. 258505), San Francisco, California, Patrick E. Gibbs (Bar No. 183174), Menlo Park, California, Attorneys for Defendants, IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LARRY HSU and ARTHUR A. KOCH.

GOLD BENNETT CERA & SIDENER LLP, Solomon B. Cera, Counsel for the Boilermaker Blacksmith National Pension Trust and Liaison Counsel for the Class.

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC, Steven J. Toll (admitted pro hac vice), Daniel S. Sommers (admitted pro hac vice), Joshua M. Kolsky (admitted pro hac vice), Washington, D.C., Christopher Lometti (admitted pro hac vice), New York, New York, Counsel for the Boilermaker Blacksmith National Pension Trust and Lead Counsel for the Class

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP, Peter A. Wald (Bar No. 85705), Marcy C. Priedeman (Bar No. 258505), San Francisco, California, and Patrick E. Gibbs (Bar No. 183174), Menlo Park, California, Counsel for Defendants Impax Laboratories, Inc., Larry Hsu, and Arthur A. Koch.

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DATE OF MOTION HEARING FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Defendants Impax Laboratories, Inc., Larry Hsu, and Arthur A. Koch, by and through their respective counsel, (collectively, "Defendants"), and Lead Plaintiff Boilermaker Blacksmith National Pension Trust, by and through its respective counsel ("Lead Plaintiff"), hereby stipulate to the following:

WHEREAS, on March 7, 2013, Plaintiff Denis Mulligan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a complaint captioned Denis Mulligan v. Impax Laboratories, Inc. et al., No. 13-cv-01037, a putative class action under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "PSLRA") alleging securities fraud (the " Mulligan matter");

WHEREAS, pursuant to the March 7, 2013 Case Management Conference Order, the Initial Case Management Conference for the Mulligan matter was initially scheduled for June 6, 2013;

WHEREAS, on April 8, 2013, Plaintiff Haverhill Retirement Center, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a complaint captioned Haverhill Retirement System v. Impax Laboratories, Inc. et al., No. 13-cv-01566, also a putative class action under the PSLRA alleging securities fraud (the " Haverhill matter").

WHEREAS, pursuant to the April 8, 2013 Case Management Conference Order, the Initial Case Management Conference for the Haverhill matter was initially scheduled for July 12, 2013;

WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, and April 22, 2013, Plaintiffs Haverhill and Mulligan, respectively, stipulated with Defendants to continue the Initial Case Management Conferences in their respective matters until after the Defendants filed an answer, which would follow any ruling on Defendants' motion to dismiss (the Mulligan matter, Dkt. #15 ¶ 9; the Haverhill matter, Dkt. #16 ¶ 9);

WHEREAS, pursuant to those stipulations, on April 25, 2013, the Court reset the respective Initial Case Management Conferences for November 7, 2013 (the Mulligan matter, Dkt. #15; the Haverhill matter, Dkt. #16);

WHEREAS, on July 2, 2013, the Court consolidated the Mulligan and Haverhill matters and appointed Boilermaker Blacksmith National ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.