Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Chick v. Lacey

United States District Court, E.D. California

February 27, 2014

WAYNE CHICK, Plaintiff,
v.
B. A. LACEY, et al., Defendants.

ORDER PROVIDING DEFENDANT WATTLE WITH THE OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW GOOD CAUSE FOR FAILING TO WAIVE SERVICE

DENNIS L. BECK, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Wayne Chick ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action filed on August 29, 2011.

On July 22, 2013, the Court ordered the United States Marshal to serve process upon Defendants in this case. The Marshal was directed to attempt to secure a waiver of service before attempting personal service on Defendants. If a waiver of service was not returned by a Defendant within sixty days, the Marshal was directed to effect personal service on the Defendant in accordance with the provisions of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. ยง 566(c), without prepayment of costs, and to file the return of service with evidence of any attempt to secure a waiver of service and with evidence of all costs subsequently incurred in effecting personal service.

On February 7, 2014, the United States Marshal filed a return of service with a USM-285 form showing charges of $367.52 for effecting personal service on Defendant D. Wattle. ECF No. 26. The form shows that a waiver of service form was mailed to Defendant Wattle on July 30, 2013.

Pursuant to the Court's order, Defendants are required to return the waivers to the United States Marshal and the filing of an answer or a motion does not relieve them of this obligation. Defendant Wattle did not return a waiver, which resulted in the execution of personal service on February 5, 2014.

Defendant Wattle filed a motion to dismiss on February 26, 2014.

Rule 4 provides that "[a]n individual, corporation, or association that is subject to service under Rule 4(e), (f), or (h) has a duty to avoid unnecessary expenses of serving the summons." Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(1). "If a defendant located within the United States fails, without good cause, to sign and return a waiver requested by a plaintiff located within the United States, the court must impose on the defendant... the expenses later incurred in making service...." Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(2)(A).

It appears that Defendant Wattle was given the opportunity required by Rule 4(d)(1) to waive service, but he failed to return his waiver to the United States Marshal, although he did make an appearance in the action. The Court shall provide Defendant Wattle with the opportunity to show good cause for failing to waive service. If Defendant Wattle either fails to respond to this order or responds but fails to show good cause, the costs incurred in effecting service shall be imposed on Defendant Wattle.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Wattle may, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, show good cause for failing to waive service; and

2. If Defendant Wattle either fails to respond to this order or responds but fails to show good cause, the Court shall impose upon Defendant Wattle the costs incurred in effecting service.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.