United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
March 5, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
MICHAEL EDWARD HINGLE, Defendant.
MELINDA HAAG, United States Attorney.
J. DOUGLAS WILSON, Chief, Criminal Division.
DANIEL R. KALEBA, MATTHEW A. PARRELLA, Assistant United States Attorney, San Jose, California, Attorneys for United States of America.
MARY G. MCNAMARA, Attorney for Defendant.
STIPULATION AND  ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS APPEARANCE AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
D. LOWELL JENSEN, District Judge.
Defendant Michael Hingle, through defense counsel Mary McNamara, and the United States government, through Assistant United States Attorney Daniel Kaleba, stipulate as follows:
The parties are currently scheduled to appear before this Court on March 6, 2014. The parties request additional time to meet and confer concerning matters relevant to the case, including ongoing discovery requests, and jointly request a one week continuance of the March 6 appearance to March 13, 2014. The parties also stipulate that the time period from March 6, 2014 to March 13, 2014, should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) to further the interest of justice, and to promote the continuity and effective preparation of counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
 ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS APPEARANCE AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT [18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)]
Based on the reasons set forth in the stipulation of the parties filed on March 4, 2014, and good cause appearing therefrom,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing scheduled for March 4, 2014 before Judge Jensen is continued to March 13, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as may be heard by the Court.
The Court further finds that the time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act is EXCLUDED during the time period from March 6, 2014 be continued to March 13, 2014, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) to further the interest of justice, and to promote the continuity and effective preparation of counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
IT IS SO ORDERED.