Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Balero

United States District Court, E.D. California

March 7, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
EDWIN WILLIAM BALERO, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, MICHAEL McCOY, Assistant U.S. Attorney, William Bonham, Attorney at Law, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for defendant EDWIN BALERO.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

The defendant, EDWIN BALERO, through his undersigned counsel, and the United States, through its undersigned counsel, hereby agree and request that the status conference currently set for Tuesday, March 11, 2014 at 9:45 am be vacated and continued until Tuesday, April 15, 2014 at 9:45 am.

A continuance is necessary to provide the parties with additional time for case preparation, investigation, and ongoing plea and sentencing negotiations.

The parties stipulate that time should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act to allow the defendant continuity of counsel and to provide the parties additional time for case preparation and ongoing plea and sentencing negotiations. Local Code T4 & 18 U.S.C § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv).

I, William E. Bonham, the filing party, have received authorization from AUSA Michael McCoy to sign and submit this stipulation and proposed order on his behalf.

Accordingly, the defense and the United States agree and request that the status conference for defendant EDWIN BALERO, be continued to Tuesday, April 15, 2014 at 9:45 am. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The status conference for defendant, EDWIN BALERO, currently set for Tuesday, March 11, 2014 at 9:45 am should be vacated and continued to Tuesday, April 15, 2014 at 9:45 am.

I find that the continuance is necessary due to the needs of counsel for continued case preparation and plea/sentencing negotiations and that a failure to do so would deny counsel reasonable time for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Accordingly, time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, due to needs of counsel for additional case preparation and ongoing plea/sentencing negotiations, from March 11, 2014 up to and including April 15, 2014 pursuant to Local Code T4 and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). I find that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.