Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Razzak

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

March 10, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
ARSHAD RAZZAK, RICHARD YICK AND RAUL ERIC ELIAS, Defendants.

MELINDA HAAG, United States Attorney, J. DOUGLAS WILSON, Chief, Criminal Division, RODNEY C. VILLAZOR, JOHN H. HEMANN, Assistant United States Attorneys, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for United States of America.

MICHAEL RAINS, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Arshad Razzak.

PETER FURST, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Richard Yick.

MATTHEW PAVONE, Esq., Attorney for Defendant Raul Eric Elias.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND WAIVING TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT TO APRIL 8, 2014 AT 2:30 P.M.

RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

The parties are scheduled to appear before the Court in the above-captioned matter on April 8, 2014 for status and motion hearing on the Indictment. The parties request that this Court set the briefing schedule as follows:

March 20, 2014 - motions due
March 27, 2014 - opposition due
April 1, 2014 - reply due

Defense counsel reserve their right to request from the Court a modification of this briefing schedule, including a postponement of the motion hearing if, after they have received discovery from the United States, they determine that they need additional time to adequately prepare the motions subject to this Order.

In addition, as set forth on the record on March 4, 2014, the parties request that the Court exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act between March 4, 2014 and April 8, 2014. The parties stipulate that the time is excludable from the time limitations of the Speedy Trial Act because the interests of justice are served by granting a continuance, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). Such continuance is required because government counsel will be producing discovery, and defense counsel needs the time to review the discovery and prepare their motions. This continuance will allow the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation and continuity of counsel taking into account the exercise of due diligence. As such, the parties respectfully request that the time between March 4, 2014 and April 8, 2014 be excluded under U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

ORDER

Based on the reason provided in the stipulation of the parties above, the Court hereby ORDERS, the following briefing schedule:

March 20, 2014 - motions due
March 27, 2014 - opposition due
April 1, 2014 - reply due

The Court also hereby FINDS that for adequate preparation of the case by all parties and continuity of counsel, and in the interest of justice, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), an exclusion of time is warranted under the Speedy Trial Act. Based on these findings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT time is excluded until April 8, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.