Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Armstrong v. Pelayo

United States District Court, E.D. California

March 14, 2014

BRADY K. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff,
v.
D. PELAYO, Defendant.

ORDER (1) ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL AND (2) DENYING MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge.

Plaintiff Brady K. Armstrong, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 8, 2013. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 14, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations recommending Plaintiff's various motions for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. Plaintiff did not file an Objection. Local Rule 304(b).

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed on February 14, 2014 (Doc. No. 25), is adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's motions for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on July 8, 2013 (Doc. No. 5), July 22, 2013 (Doc. No. 8), and September 5, 2013 (Doc. Nos. 16, 17), are DENIED for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.