United States District Court, E.D. California
ORDER ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE IDENTIFYING DEFENDANTS (Doc. 6.) ORDER INFORMING PLAINTIFF HE IS PERMITTED TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AS A MATTER OF COURSE ORDER FOR CLERK TO SEND COMPLAINT FORM TO PLAINTIFF
GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.
Cleveland Smith ("Plaintiff") is an inmate at Fresno County Jail, proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 22, 2014, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (Doc. 1.)
On June 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed a notice identifying the defendants to this action. (Doc. 6.)
II. LOCAL RULE 220 AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 15(a) - AMENDING THE COMPLAINT
Local Rule 220 provides, in part:
Unless prior approval to the contrary is obtained from the Court, every pleading to which an amendment or supplement is permitted as a matter of right or has been allowed by court order shall be retyped and filed so that it is complete in itself without reference to the prior or superseded pleading. No pleading shall be deemed amended or supplemented until this Rule has been complied with. All changed pleadings shall contain copies of all exhibits referred to in the changed pleading.
Plaintiff's notice identifies defendants to this action who were not identified by name in the Complaint. Plaintiff may not amend the Complaint in this manner. Under Rule 220, Plaintiff may not amend the Complaint by adding information piecemeal after the Complaint has been filed. To add information or correct an error in the Complaint, Plaintiff must file a new First Amended Complaint which is complete within itself.
Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, a party may amend the party's pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served. Otherwise, a party may amend only by leave of the court or by written consent of the adverse party, and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). Here, because Plaintiff has not previously amended the complaint and no responsive pleading has been served in this action, Plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint as a matter of course. Plaintiff shall be required to file an amended complaint within thirty days, making the needed changes.
Plaintiff is informed he must demonstrate in his amended complaint how the conditions complained of have resulted in a deprivation of plaintiff's constitutional rights. See Ellis v. Cassidy , 625 F.2d 227 (9th Cir. 1980). The complaint must allege in specific terms how each named defendant is involved. There can be no liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 unless there is some affirmative link or connection between a defendant's actions and the claimed deprivation. Rizzo v. Goode , 423 U.S. 36 (1976); May v. Enomoto , 633 F.2d 164, 167 (9th Cir. 1980); Johnson v. Duffy , 588 F.2d 740, 743 (9th Cir. 1978).
As a general rule, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. See Loux v. Rhay , 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). Once an amended complaint is filed, the original complaint no longer serves any function in the case. Therefore, in an amended complaint, as in an original complaint, each claim and the involvement of each defendant must be sufficiently alleged.
Plaintiff should note that although he has the opportunity to amend, it is not for the purpose of adding allegations of events occurring after May 22, 2014. Plaintiff may not change the nature of this suit by adding new, unrelated claims in his amended complaint. George v. Smith , 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007) (no "buckshot" complaints). In addition, Plaintiff should take care to include only those claims that were exhausted prior to the initiation of this suit on May 22, 2014.
Finally, Plaintiff is advised that Local Rule 220 requires that an amended complaint be complete in itself without reference to any prior pleading. The First Amended Complaint should be clearly and boldly titled "FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, " refer to the ...