Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Apel

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

August 14, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOHN DENNIS APEL, Defendant-Appellant

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court. D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00830-JFW-1, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00869-JFW-1, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00831-JFW-1.

Erwin Chemerinsky, Selwyn Chu (argued) and Matthew Plunkett (argued), law students, University of California, Irvine School of Law, for Defendant-Appellant.

André Birotte Jr., United States Attorney, Robert E. Dugdale and Mark R. Yohalem (argued), Assistant United States Attorneys, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: Barry G. Silverman and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges, and John R. Tunheim, District Judge.[*]

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

On February 26, 2014, the United States Supreme Court vacated our opinion at 676 F.3d 1202 and remanded the case to us for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. United States v. Apel, __ U.S. __, 134 S.Ct. 1144, 188 L.Ed.2d 75 (2014).

Page 1089

In light of the Supreme Court's decision, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.