Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Zepeda v. Schuld

United States District Court, N.D. California

November 7, 2014

RICARDO ZEPEDA, Plaintiff,
v.
WALTER N. SCHULD, et al., Defendants

Ricardo Zepeda, Plaintiff, Pro se, Richmond, CA.

For Walter N. Schuld, Chief of San Pablo Police Department, Brian Bubar, Director, West Contra Costa Narcotice Enforcement Team, San Pablo Police, Defendants: James V. Fitzgerald, III, LEAD ATTORNEY, Noah G. Blechman, McNamara, Ney, Beatty, Slattery, Borges & Brothers LLP, Walnut Creek, CA.

For Chris Magnus, Chief of Richmond Police Dept., Defendant: G. Scott Emblidge, LEAD ATTORNEY, Erin Hansen Reding, Moscone Emblidge Sater & Otis LLP, San Francisco, CA.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY OF CIVIL ACTION PENDING CRIMINAL ACTION Dkt. No. 45

KANDIS A. WESTMORE, United States Magistrate Judge.

On October 9, 2014, Defendants Walter N. Schuld, Brian Bubar, Richmond Police Department, and Chris Magnus filed a motion to stay the civil action pending the outcome of Plaintiff Ricardo Zepeda's pending criminal proceeding arising from the May 6, 2013 incident alleged in his amended complaint. (Defs.' Mot., Dkt. No. 45 at 2.)

Upon review of the parties' papers, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), and, for the reasons set forth below, GRANTS Defendants' motion to stay the case pending the outcome of Plaintiff's state criminal proceeding.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Ricardo Zepeda alleges civil rights violations in connection with various contacts with law enforcement agencies and personnel, including the San Pablo Police Department, the Richmond Police Department, and the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department. (First Am. Compl., " FAC, " Dkt. No. 44.)

In 2012, Plaintiff alleges that 50-60 officers came to his house, kicked down the door, searched his home without a warrant, and handcuffed Plaintiff during the duration of the search. (FAC ¶ 9.)

On February 20, 2013, Plaintiff's residence was again searched by the San Pablo Police Department without a warrant. (FAC ¶ 10.) During that search they seized a firearm, and arrested Plaintiff. Id. He was allegedly interrogated at the Richmond Police Department, where he asked for a lawyer, and was denied. Id. He was later released from custody. Id.

On May 6, 2013, Officer Bubar served Plaintiff with an allegedly invalid search warrant for his residence. (FAC ¶ 11.) During that search, Plaintiff was handcuffed by Officer Bubar and arrested for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Id. Plaintiff was then interrogated despite demanding an attorney. Id. Plaintiff was only released after he promised to cooperate. Id. Charges were not immediately filed. Id. Additionally, Plaintiff generally alleges that officers seized property, including gold and cash, from his residence that was never included on the property lists and was not returned. Id.

On December 12, 2013, Plaintiff filed this lawsuit in federal court containing numerous allegations of police conduct.

On July 31, 2014, Plaintiff appeared in Superior Court for the County of Contra Costa on charges in connection with the May 6, 2013 incident. (FAC ¶ 12.)

On August 22, 2014, a felony complaint was filed against Plaintiff in Contra Costa County Superior Court charging him with being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, stemming from the May 6, 2013 incident. (Decl. of Noah Blechman, " Blechman Decl., " Dkt. 45-1 ¶ 3, Ex. B.) On August 28, 2014, Plaintiff was booked on those charges. (FAC ¶ ¶ ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.