United States District Court, Eastern District of California.
November 13, 2014
CHARLES T. DAVIS, Plaintiff,
CLARK J. KELSO, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS FROM THE ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND REFERRING MATTER BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR INITIATION OF SERVICE OF PROCESS [ECF No. 73]
LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Charles T. Davis is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On October 3, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Findings and Recommendation finding certain claims cognizable and certain claims not cognizable. (ECF No. 73.) The Findings and Recommendation was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed in thirty days. No objections were filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed on October 3, 2014, is adopted in full;
2. This action shall proceed against Defendants Cate and Yates for deliberate indifference to conditions of confinement by allowing by allowing Plaintiff to be transferred and housed at PVSP where he contracted Valley Fever;
3. Defendants Kelso and Igbinosa and Plaintiff’s state law claim be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief; and
4. This matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for initiation of service of process.
IT IS SO ORDERED.