Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Guidry v. Cate

United States District Court, C.D. California

November 18, 2014

JOHN E. GUIDRY, II, Petitioner,
v.
MATTHEW CATE, Respondent

John E. Guidry, II, Petitioner, Pro se, Elk Creek, CA.

For Matthew Cate, Respondent: Attorney General, LEAD ATTORNEY, State of California, Office of the Attorney General, San Diego, CA; Sabrina Y Lane-Erwin, LEAD ATTORNEY, CAAG Office of Attorney General of California, San Diego, CA.

For Camilla Harris, Respondent: Attorney General, LEAD ATTORNEY, State of California, Office of the Attorney General, San Diego, CA.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GEORGE H. KING, United States District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge,

IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.