Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Khan v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

United States District Court, E.D. California

November 20, 2014

KHALID KHAN, Plaintiff,
v.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants

Khalid N Khan, Plaintiff, Pro se, Sacramento, CA.

For U.S. Bank National Association, as Beneficiary also known as U.S. Bank.Com, N.A, Defendant: Joshua D. Wayser, LEAD ATTORNEY, Katten Muchin Rosenman Llp, Los Angeles, CA.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). As provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the court may dismiss an action where service of summons is not made within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. This action was filed December 16, 2013[1] and plaintiff has not yet served defendants with summons, despite having been cautioned twice that this action may be dismissed if service was not timely completed. ECF Nos. 2 and 18.

A status conference was held before the undersigned on November 19, 2014. Plaintiff did not file a status report and failed to appear. Despite two orders directing plaintiff to timely serve summons, plaintiff has failed to do so. It appears plaintiff has abandoned this litigation.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned " Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.