Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Reade v. Colvin

United States District Court, E.D. California

December 2, 2014

SHERRI READE, Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

Sherri A Reade, Plaintiff, Pro se, Olivehurst, CA.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

By order filed August 18, 2014, plaintiff was directed to submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint within fourteen days, and to file a statement with the court that said documents had been submitted to the United States Marshal. Plaintiff failed to timely submit the statement of compliance. Plaintiff was therefore directed to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff did not respond to the order to show cause and the court therefore recommended that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff then filed objections. The court thereafter vacated the findings and recommendations and ordered plaintiff to submit the requisite documents to the United States Marshal for service of process no later than November 21, 2014 and to file a statement of compliance. Plaintiff has again failed to comply with the court's order and there is no evidence that plaintiff has completed the steps necessary to effectuate service.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned " Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.