United States District Court, Eastern District of California
December 4, 2014
WILLIAM J WHITSITT, Plaintiff,
HEDY HOLMES STAFFING SERVS., et al., Defendants.
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On October 7, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 33. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 34. Defendants San Joaquin County WorkNet and Mike Sansone have also filed an opposition to plaintiff’s objections. ECF No. 35.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 7, 2014, are adopted in full; and 2. WorkNet’s June 30, 2014, motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16) is granted as follows:
a. Plaintiffs claim(s) against defendant Mark Sansone under the ADEA are dismissed with prejudice;
b. Plaintiffs claims against WorkNet and non-ADEA claims against Sansone are dismissed with leave to amend;
3. Plaintiffs claim(s) under the ADEA against “Kathleen” are dismissed sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), with prejudice; and
4. Plaintiffs remaining claims against the non-moving defendants are dismissed sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), with leave to amend.