Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bjelajac v. Supervalu Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California

December 15, 2014

Terry Bjelajac
v.
Supervalu Inc., et al.

MEMORANDUM

DALE S. FISCHER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Although adequacy of counsel is ordinarily determined at a later stage of the proceedings, it appears an early preliminary determination of whether Plaintiff's counsel are likely to be found adequate would serve the interests of the putative class and of judicial economy. Therefore, Plaintiff's counsel are ordered to show cause why they would be adequate counsel to represent the class if a class were certified. In appointing class counsel, the Court:

(A) must consider:
(i) the work counsel has done in identifying or investigating potential claims in the action;
(ii) counsel's experience in handling class actions, other complex litigation, and the types of claims asserted in the action;
(iii) counsel's knowledge of the applicable law; and
(iv) the resources that counsel will commit to representing the class;
(B) may consider any other matter pertinent to counsel's ability to fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class;
(C) may order potential class counsel to provide information on any subject pertinent to the appointment and to propose terms for attorney's fees and nontaxable costs.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(g)(1).

A written response must be submitted no later than January 5, 2015. The response should provide full and complete information responsive to Rule 23(g)(1)(A) and (B), and sufficient for the Court to make an informed decision. Among other things, counsel must:

1. Identify (by court, case name, case number, etc.) all putative class actions filed by counsel in any court, and state whether a class was certified, and, if so, whether counsel was named as class counsel;

2. Describe counsel's trial experience;

3. Identify (by court, case name, case number, etc.) any case in which the court found counsel not to be adequate to represent a class or otherwise declined to grant counsel's request to be appointed, and specify the reasons given by ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.