United States District Court, C.D. California
JULIAN M. BARRON
AREF FAKHOURY, et al
Julian M. Barron, Plaintiff, Pro se, Calipatria, CA.
For M. Farooq, M.D. in individual capacity, T. Le, M.D. in individual capacity, Defendants: Jill Alicia Vander Borght, CAAG - Office of the Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA.
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Frederick F. Mumm, United States Magistrate Judge.
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING ADDRESS
On October 30, 2014, defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint in this case. On November 4, 2014, the Court issued an order setting a briefing schedule on defendants' motion. The service copy of that order sent to plaintiff has since been returned to the Court with the notation " Inactive" and " Refused."
Pursuant to Local Rule 41-6:
A party proceeding pro se shall keep the Court and opposing parties apprised of such party's current address and telephone number, if any. If mail directed by the Clerk to a pro se plaintiff's address of record is returned undelivered by the Postal Service, and if, within fifteen (15) days of the service date, such plaintiff fails to notify, in writing, the Court and opposing parties of said plaintiff's current address, the Court may dismiss the action with or without prejudice for want of prosecution.
Local Rule 41-6; see Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988).
Plaintiff is ordered to show cause within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to inform the Court of his change of address.
Failure to file a timely response to this order within the time specified will be deemed consent to ...