United States District Court, Central District of California
December 17, 2014
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET M WORKERS' PENSION PLAN OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA AND NEVADA ET AL
PRECISION CLIMATE CONTROL, INC. ET AL
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL RE LACK OF PROSECUTION
Honorable Margaret M. Morrow . U.S. District Judge
Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 120 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 20 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.RCiv.Proc. 12(a)(1).
In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before December 29. 2014, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order To Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff s response.
If plaintiff/defendant files:
Proof(s) of service of summons and complaint on the following defendant(s): Precision Climate Control, Inc. and/or
An answer by the following defendant(s): Precision Climate Control, Inc.
CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL
Plaintiffs motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:
on or before the date indicated above, the court will consider this a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause.