Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Vogel v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.

United States District Court, C.D. California

January 8, 2015

Martin Vogel
v.
Thrifty Payless, Inc. et al

For Martin Vogel, Plaintiff: Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV, Stephanie Lilian Ross, LEAD ATTORNEYS, Disabled Advocacy Group APLC, Chico, CA.

For Thrifty Payless Inc, doing business as Rite Aid #5438, Defendant: Wayne C Arnold, LEAD ATTORNEY, Lurie Zepeda Schmalz and Hogan, Beverly Hills, CA; Payton E Garofalo, Lurie Zepeda Schmalz & Hogan, Beverly Hills, CA.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before January 16, 2015 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.