Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Windley v. Soto

United States District Court, C.D. California

January 26, 2015

JAMES WINDLEY, Petitioner,
v.
J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent

James Windley, Petitioner, Pro se, Lancaster, CA.

For J. Soto, Warden, Respondent: Rama R Maline, CAAG - Office of Attorney General of California, Los Angeles, CA.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice.

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge,

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.