United States District Court, Central District of California
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Honorable Sheri Pym, United States Magistrate Judge.
On October 21, 2014, plaintiff Arnulfo Nodal, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His complaint alleged that an off-duty police offer assaulted and shot him. On December 8, 2014, this court, having completed screening of the complaint, dismissed it with leave to file a First Amended Complaint by January 7, 2015. Three weeks having passed beyond this deadline, the court has not received a First Amended Complaint or any other communication from plaintiff.
Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, that is, by February 19, 2015, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to timely file a response to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed by the court as consent to the dismissal of this action without prejudice. In the event plaintiff wishes to voluntarily dismiss this action, plaintiff may complete and return the enclosed Notice of Dismissal form by February 19, 2015.
If plaintiff files a First Amended Complaint by February 19, 2015, this Order to Show Cause will be automatically discharged, and ...