United States District Court, C.D. California
January 30, 2015
LOFTON RYAN BURRIS, Plaintiff,
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants
Lofton Ryan Burris, Plaintiff, Pro se, Carson, CA.
For Wells Fargo Bank NA, Wells Fargo Bank NA, As Trustee for ABFC 2006-OPT11, ABFC Asset-Backed Certificate, Series, 2006-OPT, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, Kathyrn Moorer, Nicole Glowin, Power Default Services, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Altsource, Defendants: Kathryn Anne Moorer, Wright Finlay and Zak LLP, Newport Beach, CA.
For County of Los Angeles Sheriff Department, Harris County Sheriff Office, Harris County Attorney Office, Brian Anthony Quintero, Defendants: Gilbert M Nishimura, Seki Nishimura and Watase LLP, Los Angeles, CA.
For Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Defendant: Kathleen A Waters, Morgan Lewis and Bockius LLP, Los Angeles, CA.
For EMC Mortgage Corporation, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Defendants: Brian Ming Hom, Kathleen A Waters, Morgan Lewis and Bockius LLP, Los Angeles, CA.
For Jack O' Boyle & Associates, Defendant: Stephen M Lewis, Malcolm Cisneros, Irvine, CA.
For Bank of America, N.A., Defendant: Nafiz Cekirge, Bryan Cave LLP, Santa Monica, CA.
For Midsouth National Bank, NA, L. Jay Angelle, Defendants: Elissa D Miller, SulmeyerKupetz ALC, Los Angeles, CA.
For Quality Loan Service Corp, McCarthy & Holtus, LLP, Defendants: Douglas A. Toleno, LEAD ATTORNEY, McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, San Diego, CA.
For TD Services Company, Defendant: Lawrence J Dreyfuss, The Dreyfuss Firm, Irvine, CA.
For NBS Default Services, LLC, Defendant: Mark David Estle, LEAD ATTORNEY, Endres & Estle, San Diego, CA.
For Ticor Title Company of California, Defendant: Kevin R Broersma, LEAD ATTORNEY, Fidelity National Law Group, Los Angeles, CA.
For Kevin Maliczak, Global Equity Builder, Inc., DefendantS: Stuart Thomas Miller, Carlson Law Group, Inc., Woodland Hills, CA.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.
Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,
IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed without prejudice.