United States District Court, C.D. California
ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING THE HABEAS PETITION, AND
DISMISSING THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, Senior District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the "Petition") (CM/ECF Document ("Doc") 1), the respondent's answer and accompanying memorandum of points and authorities (Docs 5-6), the documents lodged by the respondent (Doc 7), petitioner's reply (Doc 8), the applicable law, and the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc 15). Petitioner has not filed objections.
The well-reasoned Report and Recommendation [Doc #15] is ADOPTED.
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus [Doc #1] is DENIED.
This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
Per Fed.R.Civ.P. 58(a), final judgment will be entered by ...