United States District Court, E.D. California
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 1)
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Roland Thomas Koch ("Plaintiff") is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. Plaintiff initiated this action on November 24, 2014. Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff's complaint is currently before the Court for screening.
I. Screening Requirement
"Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that... the action or appeal... fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
A complaint must contain "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief...." Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2). Detailed factual allegations are not required, but "[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550.S. 544, 555 (2007)). Plaintiff must set forth "sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'" Id . (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570). While factual allegations are accepted as true, legal conclusions are not. Id.
II. Allegations in Complaint
Plaintiff names Coalinga State Hospital as the sole defendant. He alleges as follows:
Simply, my property continuesly [sic] is lost, ' confiscated, ETC. And the "Rules/procedures" are NOT honored. Despite my following the Rules/Procedures' here (Paperwork) I can NOT gain resolution to my complaints.
I can NOT do names & dates as MY copies of Paperwork are lost' by CSH. (ECF No. 1, p. 3) (emphasis in original). Plaintiff requests that his lost property be found, returned or that he be reimbursed for its loss.
A. Coalinga State Hospital
Plaintiff names Coalinga State Hospital as the sole defendant. Plaintiff cannot maintain an action against a state hospital. The Eleventh Amendment bars suits against state agencies as well as those where the state itself is named as a defendant. Aholelei v. Dept. of Public Safety, 488 F.3d 1144, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). As Coalinga State Hospital is a part of the California Department of State Hospitals, a state agency, it enjoys Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit.
B. Property Loss
Plaintiff's complaint appears to concern the ...