Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Burnett v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.

United States District Court, C.D. California

February 9, 2015



DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.

Presently before the court is Defendant Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. ("Northwest")'s Motion to Dismiss. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the court grants the motion and adopts the following order.[1]

I. Background

As described in Northwest's motion, and undisputed by Plaintiff, in 2007 Plaintiff obtained a loan secured by a Deed of Trust to property located at 811 North Albertson Avenue in Compton, California. In August 2013, Northwest recorded a Notice of Default, and in December 2013 recorded a Notice of Trustee's sale. The sale took place in January 2014.

Plaintiff then filed the instant complaint against Northwest alleging causes of action for (1) "Negligent, Wanton, and/or Intentional Hiring and Supervision of Incompetent Employees or Agents" and (2) violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1692. Northwest now moves to dismiss.

II. Legal Standard

A complaint will survive a motion to dismiss when it contains "sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). When considering a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, a court must "accept as true all allegations of material fact and must construe those facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff." Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). Although a complaint need not include "detailed factual allegations, " it must offer "more than an unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation." Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678. Conclusory allegations or allegations that are no more than a statement of a legal conclusion "are not entitled to the assumption of truth." Id. at 679. In other words, a pleading that merely offers "labels and conclusions, " a "formulaic recitation of the elements, " or "naked assertions" will not be sufficient to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Id. at 678 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).

"When there are well-pleaded factual allegations, a court should assume their veracity and then determine whether they plausibly give rise to an entitlement of relief." Id. at 679. Plaintiffs must allege "plausible grounds to infer" that their claims rise "above the speculative level." Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555. "Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for relief" is a "context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense." Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 679.

III. Discussion

A. Negligence

"The elements of a negligence cause of action are the existence of a legal duty of care, breach of that duty, and proximate cause resulting in injury." Castellon v. U.S. Bancorp., 220 Cal.App.4th 994, 998 (2013). Whether a duty exists is a question of law, dependent upon a balancing of factors including "the foreseeability of harm to the plaintiff, the degree of certainty that the plaintiff suffered injury, the closeness of the connection between the conduct and the injury, the moral blame attached to the defendant's conduct, the policy of preventing future harm, the extent of the burden to the defendant and consequences to the community...." Mendoza v. City of Los Angeles, 66 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1339 (1998). There can be no negligent supervision, however, without "knowledge by the principal that the agent or servant was a person who could not be trusted to act properly without being supervised." Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 33 Cal.App.3d 654, 664 (1973). There can be no liability for negligent hiring unless the employer knows, "or has reason to believe[, ] the employee is unfit or fails to use reasonable care to discover the employee's unfitness before hiring him." Juarez v. Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 81 Cal.App.4th 377, 398 (2000) (internal quotation and citation omitted).

The Complaint does not allege that Northwest owed any duty to Plaintiff in its hiring of its employees, agents, or others. Nor does the complaint allege facts sufficient to establish the existence of a duty, damages, or Northwest's knowledge of its employees' deficiencies. Accordingly, the first cause of action must be dismissed.


The Complaint appears to allege that Northwest violated the FDCPA by attempting to collect on Plaintiff's home loan. The FDCPA generally prohibits abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by "debt collectors." 15 U.S.C. § 1692. The term "debt collector, " however, does not apply to a mortgage service company, and the FDCPA does not apply to foreclosure-related ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.