Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mendez v. Pacquiao

United States District Court, C.D. California

May 18, 2015

Edwin Mendez, et al.
v.
Emmanuel D. Pacquiao, et al.

MEMORANDUM

DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Adequacy of Counsel

Although adequacy of counsel is ordinarily determined at a later stage of the proceedings, it appears an early preliminary determination of whether Plaintiff's counsel is likely to be found adequate would serve the interests of the putative class and of judicial economy. Therefore, Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to show cause why he would be adequate counsel to represent the class if a class were certified. In appointing class counsel, the Court:

(A) must consider:
(i) the work counsel has done in identifying or investigating potential claims in the action;
(ii) counsel's experience in handling class actions, other complex litigation, and the types of claims asserted in the action;
(iii) counsel's knowledge of the applicable law; and
(iv) the resources that counsel will commit to representing the class;
(B) may consider any other matter pertinent to counsel's ability to fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class;
(C) may order potential class counsel to provide information on any subject pertinent to the appointment and to propose terms for attorney's fees and nontaxable costs.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(g)(1).

A written response must be submitted no later than June 12. The response should provide full and complete information responsive to Rule 23(g)(1)(A) and (B), and sufficient for the Court to make an informed decision. Among other things, counsel must:

1. Identify (by court, case name, case number, etc.) all putative class actions filed by any law firm and any individual attorney seeking to be named as class counsel in any court, and state whether a class was certified, and, if so, whether the firm or attorney was named as class counsel;

2. Describe the trial experience of each individual attorney seeking to be named as class counsel;

3. Describe the experience of each individual attorney seeking to be named as class counsel in the types of claims asserted in this action;

4. Identify (by court, case name, case number, etc.) all cases in which the court found any law firm or any individual attorney seeking to be named here as class counsel not to be adequate to represent a class or otherwise declined to grant counsel's request to be appointed, and specify the reasons given by the court (or provide a copy of the opinion or decision);

5. Identify (by court, case name, case number, etc.) all cases or circumstances in which the professional conduct or professional ethics (including billing practices) of any law firm or any individual attorney seeking here to be named as class counsel have been the subject of any written inquiry by any court, administrative agency, or bar association, and provide the complete facts and disposition of the matter;

6. Identify (by court, case name, case number, etc.) all cases in which any law firm or any individual attorney seeking to be named here as class counsel has been admonished or sanctioned by any court or agency and provide the complete facts and disposition of the matter;

7. Identify (by court, case name, case number, etc.) all cases in which any counsel or any law firm representing Plaintiff has previously represented, or is currently representing, Plaintiff;

8. Provide any agreement relating to this action with any person or entity other than Plaintiff;

9. Provide counsel's proposal for terms for attorney's fees and nontaxable costs; and

10. Describe how counsel intends to staff this case and the means by which counsel will fund the necessary costs, including expert's fees. (The latter information may be filed in camera and under seal.)

See Rule 23(g)(1)(C)

The Court requires that each attorney seeking here to be named as class counsel answer separately (but not necessarily in a separate document). For item 1 only, counsel may limit their answers to cases filed within the last eight years or to their most recent 50 cases. For items 4, 5, 6, and 7, the eight year/50 case time limit does not apply. All such cases must be identified. In addition, counsel must provide all information responsive to items 4, 5, and 6 regarding any applicable case or circumstance involving a former law firm, but based on the conduct of the individual attorney seeking here to be named as class counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.