United States District Court, C.D. California
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b)
RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior District Judge.
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's Response  to the Court's Order to Show Cause , which required Plaintiff to show cause as to why this Action should not be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute her claims.
Having reviewed all papers pertaining to the Order to Show Cause  and Plaintiff's Response , the Court DISMISSES this Action with prejudice under Rule 41(b) due to Plaintiff's unreasonable failure to prosecute this Action and repeated noncompliance with Court orders. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).
Plaintiff Amy Prien ("Plaintiff") brought this Action  in September 2005. On April 26, 2006, the Court issued a stay  of the case until the conclusion of Plaintiff's related criminal prosecution. In the Order Staying Case , the Court ordered the parties "to report to the court the occurrences of that event fourteen days thereof and the status of the action." On July 17, 2006, the Court issued an Order  removing the case from the Court's active caseload and ordering only Plaintiff to "file semi-annual status reports commencing on September 1, 2006."
On September 1, 2006, Defendants filed a Status Report , but Plaintiff did not. Plaintiff has since continued to disobey the Court's Order  by failing to file even a single status report.
On November 7, 2006, Plaintiff filed a Request to Lift Stay , which was denied  on November 27, 2006, because Plaintiff's criminal prosecution had not yet concluded due to Plaintiff's pending direct appeal of her criminal conviction. Plaintiff's Request to Lift Stay, filed in November 2006, was the last action taken by Plaintiff until Plaintiff's April 22, 2015, Request  for an extension of time to respond to the Order to Show Cause.
On February 17, 2015, the Court issued an Order  requiring the parties to file a status report by March 9, 2015. The Order  clearly stated that "[f]ailure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action and/or sanctions."
On March 9, 2015, Defendants filed a timely Status Report . Plaintiff did not file anything by the deadline, thereby violating a third Court order. Defendants' Status Report  informed the Court that Plaintiff's criminal prosecution became final on September 27, 2007. Ferguson Decl. ¶ 8, Ex. 1.
On April 17, 2015, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal , requiring Plaintiff to show cause in writing by April 24, 2015, why this Action should not be dismissed for Plaintiff's lack of prosecution. On April 22, 2015, Plaintiff responded  with a request for an extension of time to respond to the Order to Show Cause. The Court granted  Plaintiff's request, ordering Plaintiff to respond by June 1, 2015. On May 18, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Response  to the Order to Show Cause.
Rather than "show cause" as to why Plaintiff's egregious lack of prosecution should not result in the dismissal of this Action, Plaintiff's Response , instead, blames the Court for Plaintiff's seven-plus years of silence. Pl.'s Resp. to OSC ("Pl.'s Resp.") 2:11-15, ECF No. 52 (stating that after Plaintiff's filing in November 2006, "[t]hereafter and for over eight years[, ] the Court took no action in this case").
Plaintiff argues that her case should not be dismissed because this Action "is and always has been a viable action" and "was made inactive over plaintiff's objection and then placed on the Court's inactive case list, " and because "[n]either the Court nor defendants have been prejudiced by the delay, although plaintiff has been prejudiced." Pl.'s Resp. 2:17-24. Finally, Plaintiff concludes that "there is no basis on which to dismiss the action." Id.
A. Legal ...