June 26, 2015
SISKIYOU COUNTY FARM BUREAU, Plaintiff and Respondent,
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, Defendant and Appellant.
IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on June 4, 2015,
237 Cal.App.4th 411; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ be modified as follows and rehearing is DENIED:
1. On page 4 [237 Cal.App.4th 421, advance report, 1st full par., line 13] in the last sentence of the first paragraph, the words “based on” are to be replaced with words “related to but not limited by” so that the sentence now reads:
The purportedly new interpretation referenced by the complaint was related to but not limited by the Stopher criteria, which presumed that any diversion of water within the relevant watershed was a substantial diversion within the meaning of section 1602.
As modified, the petition for rehearing is denied. This modification does not change the judgment.