United States District Court, C.D. California
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG, a German Corporation; and ROLLS-ROYCE MOTOR CARS LIMITED, a United Kingdom Corporation, Plaintiffs,
v.
MOOVIT INC., a California Corporation; JOHNATHAN CHONG-HAU GINGRAS a/k/a JOHNNY GINGRAS, an Individual; CARY KUO, an Individual; WILLIAM HO, an Individual; YUE X. LO, an Individual; ENOCH WONG, an Individual; KA KWAN LO SZE, an Individual; YUEN LO, an Individual; HUNG LO, an Individual; XIAO YUE LIANG, an Individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.
FINAL JUDGMENT, INCLUDING PERMANENT INJUNCTION,
AGAINST DEFENDANTS MOOVIT INC. AND JOHNATHAN CHONG-HAU
GINGRAS A/K/A JOHNNY GINGRAS ONLY JS-6: DEFENDANTS MOOVIT,
INC. AND JOHNATHAN CHONG-HAU GRINGRAS ONLY
HON.
JOHN A. KRONSTADT United States District Judge
Plaintiffs
BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC (“BMW NA”), BAYERISCHE
MOTOREN WERKE AG (“BMW AG”), and ROLLS-ROYCE
MOTOR CARS LIMITED (“RRMC”) (collectively
“Plaintiffs”), are hereby awarded final judgment
on their claims for relief against Defendants MOOVIT INC.
(“Moovit”) and JOHNATHAN CHONG-HAU GINGRAS a/k/a
JOHNNY GINGRAS (“Gingras”) (collectively
“Defendants”), as set forth in Plaintiffs’
First Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) as the
prevailing parties in this action.
IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are entitled to an award of
damages in the sum of $75, 000 (15 U.S.C. §1117
(c)(2)) pursuant to Rule 55(b) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure and under Local Rule 55-1. Under Local
Rule 55-3, Plaintiffs are awarded attorneys’ fees of
$4600. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1117(a),
Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment against said Defendants
for recovery of total costs Plaintiffs have incurred in this
action due to Defendants’ violation of 15
U.S.C. §1125(a), and willful violation of 15
U.S.C. §1125(c) in the amount of $727.82. Thus,
Defendants will be jointly and severally liable for the total
judgment amount for this action of $80, 327.82. Plaintiffs
are further awarded any interest accrued from the date of
entry of this judgment until full satisfaction thereof.
Furthermore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Defendants and their agents,
employees, officers, directors, owners, attorneys,
representatives, successor companies, related companies, and
all persons acting in concert or participation with
Defendants, and each of them, shall be permanently restrained
from:
a. The
import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, assembly,
use, acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage,
consignment, distribution, shipment, licensing, development,
display, delivery, marketing, advertising or promotion of
counterfeit products bearing the BMW®-family of related
trademarks (“Plaintiffs’ Trademarks”)
identified in the Complaint and all supporting documents and
any other unauthorized BMW®-branded products, or products
bearing Plaintiffs’ Trademarks (including any
non-genuine reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable
imitation thereof).
b. The
import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, assembly,
use, acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage,
consignment, distribution, shipment, licensing, development,
display, delivery, marketing, advertising or promotion of the
infringing and diluting product identified in the Complaint
and any other product which infringes or dilutes any
Plaintiffs’ Trademarks, trade name and/or trade dress
including, but not limited to, any of Plaintiffs’
Trademarks at issue in this action.
c. The
unauthorized use, in any manner whatsoever, of any
Plaintiffs’ Trademarks, trade name and/or trade dress
including, but not limited to, the Plaintiffs’
Trademarks at issue in this action, any variants, colorable
imitations, translations and/or simulations thereof and/or
any items that are confusingly similar thereto, including
specifically:
i. on or in conjunction with any product or service; and
ii. on or in conjunction with any advertising, promotional
materials, labels, hangtags, packaging, or containers.
d. The
use of any trademark, trade name, or trade dress that falsely
represents, or is likely to confuse, mislead or deceive
purchasers, customers, or members of the public to believe
that unauthorized product imported, exported, manufactured,
reproduced, distributed, assembled, acquired, purchased,
offered, sold, transferred, brokered, consigned, distributed,
stored, shipped, marketed, advertised and/or promoted by
Defendants originate from Plaintiffs, or that said
merchandise has been sponsored, approved, licensed by, or
associated with Plaintiffs or is, in some way, connected or
affiliated with Plaintiffs.
e.
Engaging in any conduct that falsely represents that, or is
likely to confuse, mislead, or deceive purchasers, customers,
or members of the public to believe that Defendants are
connected with, or is in some way sponsored by or affiliated
with Plaintiffs, purchases product from or otherwise has a
business relationship with Plaintiffs.
f.
Affixing, applying, annexing, or using in connection with the
manufacture, distribution, advertising, sale, and/or offering
for sale or other use of any goods, a false description or
representation, including words or symbols, tending to
falsely describe or represent such goods as being those of
Plaintiffs.
g.
Hiding, disposing of, destroying, moving, relocating or
transferring any and all products, advertising, promotional
materials, labels, hangtags, packaging or containers bearing
any of Plaintiffs’ Trademarks; and/or
h.
Disposing of, destroying, moving, relocating or transferring
any documents or things, including electronic records,
pertaining to the purchase, procurement, development, making,
manufacture, use, display, advertisement, marketing,
licensing, sale, offer for sale, distribution, shipping, or
delivery of any products or services bearing any
...