Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Barrilleaux v. Mendocino County

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

July 12, 2016

JESSICA BARRILLEAUX, Plaintiff,
v.
MENDOCINO COUNTY; SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF MENDOCINO; JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, Defendants.

          Jessica Barrilleaux, Plaintiff, represented by Paul Leslie Rein, Law Offices of Paul L. Rein, Celia Louise McGuinness, Law Offices of Paul L. Rein & Jim W. Yu, Law Offices of Jim W. Yu.

          Mendocino County, Defendant, represented by Anne L. Keck, Keck Law Offices, Brina Anna Latkin, County Counsel's Office & Marc A. Koonin, Sedgwick LLP.

          Mendocino County Superior Court, Defendant, represented by James S. Brown, Sedwick LLP, Kevin E. Gilbert, Lozano Smith & Marc A. Koonin, Sedgwick LLP.

          Judicial Council of California/Administrative Office of the Courts, Defendant, represented by James S. Brown, Sedwick LLP, Kevin E. Gilbert, Lozano Smith & Marc A. Koonin, Sedgwick LLP.

          STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; [PROPOSED ORDER] DEFENDANTS.

          THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.

         PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2 and 7-12, and supported by the declarations contained herein, the parties through undersigned counsel hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the hearing date on Plaintiff Jessica Barrileaux's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 99) from August 8, 2016 to August 22, 2016. The Parties also stipulate and respectfully request that the Court order the briefing schedule to track the new hearing date, with Defendants' Opposition date continued to July 22, 2016, and Plaintiff's Reply date continued to August 5, 2016.

         The acceptance of this stipulated request will obviate the need for the court to address Judicial Defendants' Motion to Extend Time to File Opposition To Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 107).

         The parties declare in support of this request:

         WHEREAS Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction was filed on July 1, 2016, immediately before the Independence Day weekend;

         WHEREAS due to the holidays and resulting shortened work-week, Judicial Defendants met and conferred with Plaintiff, seeking additional time to review and respond to Plaintiff's Motion;

         WHEREAS Plaintiff agrees to the additional time request, and Defendant County of Mendocino joins in the request;

         WHEREAS there are no prior time modifications in this matter, whether by stipulation or court order; and

         WHEREAS the requested time modification would not result in any substantive ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.