Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. a Total of $795

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division

July 17, 2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
A TOTAL OF $795, 973.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, ET AL. Defendants. JON STORMS, JOSEPH STORMS, SUSY STORMS, BRYAN GOVERNOR, and STORMS9080811 LLC, Claimants.

          EILEEN M. DECKER, United States Attorney

          LAWRENCE S. MIDDLETON, Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division

          STEVEN R. WELK, Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section

          JONATHAN GALATZAN, Assistant United States Attorney Asset Forfeiture Section

          CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE

          HON. S. JAMES OTERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Plaintiff and Claimants Jon Storms, Joseph Storms, Susy Storms, Bryan Governor, and Storms90808II LLC (“Claimants”) have made a stipulated request for the entry of this Consent Judgment, resolving this action in its entirety. The defendant assets were seized from Claimants, and they assert an interest in the defendant assets and have filed claims in this case and have answered the complaint. No other claims or answers were filed, and the time for filing claims and answers has expired. No other person other than potential claimant Rebecca Rychlak is believed to have any claim to the defendant assets.

         The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, HEREBY ORDERS ADJUDGES AND DECREES:

         1. The government has given and published notice of this action as required by law, including Rule G of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of this Court. Claimants have filed claims and answers to contest the forfeiture of the defendant assets. No other claims were filed, and the time for filing claims and answers has expired. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this judgment and the defendant assets. Any potential claimants to the defendant assets other than Claimants are deemed to have admitted the allegations of the complaint with respect to the defendant assets.

         2. The following defendant assets shall be returned to Claimants as follows:

a. $1, 000.00 in U.S. currency, seized on August 22, 2012, without interest shall be returned to potential claimant Rebecca Rychlak);

         The following assets shall be returned to Claimants through their counsel:

b. $997.00 in U.S. currency, seized on August 22, 2012, without interest;
c. $547.00 in U.S. currency, seized on August 22, 2012, without interest;
d. $490.00 in U.S. currency, seized on August 22, 2012, ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.