Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dennis F. v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.

United States District Court, N.D. California

July 22, 2016

DENNIS F., CAROL F., and GRACE F.; Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. KIM B. and AVIVA B. Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ALISON B. and DANIEL B. Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. WILLIAM B. and RYAN B. Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. LLOYD B. and TALYA B. Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. RODNEY K. and BRIAN K. Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. MARK L. and ELAINE L. Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. R.M. and M.M. Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. PERRY P. and EVAN P. Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. RICHARD R. and SUSANNA R. Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. DAGMAR W. and SAMANTHA W.. Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. CHERYL N. and TRISTAN W. Plaintiffs,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

          Third Amended Complaint Filed: 04/13/2016

          Complaint Filed: 03/22/2016

          [PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING PARTIES’ REQUEST TO FILE FULL SCOPE OF EVIDENCE TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE COURT IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT

          HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

         ORDER

         Good cause being shown in the Parties’ Joint Stipulation To File Full Scope of Evidence To Be Considered By The Court In Electronic Format, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

         1. The Parties will file a motion to seal the Full Scope of Evidence To Be Considered By The Court pursuant to Local Rule 79-5, with a supporting declaration;

         2. Along with the motion to seal, the Parties will submit the agreed–upon evidentiary record for all twelve related cases on a USB drive containing an electronic, rendered-text, searchable record, and the Parties will work with the Court as needed to ensure that the Court can easily access the documents on the USB drive;

         3. The Parties will electronically file a Manual Filing Notification concurrently with their motion to seal;

         4. The USB drive will be password-protected, and the password will be provided in a separate communication to Chambers;

         5. The materials on this USB drive will be organized in folders by claim/case number, for ease of reference by the Court;

         6. Assuming the motion to seal is granted, the USB drive already submitted with the to motion for seal shall be deemed to be filed with, and accepted by, this Court, and the parties may refer to the relevant pages by Bates number in either their briefs on the standard of review or on the merits;

* In moving to seal, the parties are advised to pay particular attention to subsection (b) of the above-referenced rule, which provides, inter a lia, that "the request must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material." See Civil L.R. 79-5(b).

         7. The Parties will provide the Court with paper copies of any specific pages, documents, or broader subsets of the evidentiary record cited to in their briefs, provided that they will be provided and maintained confidentially and under ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.