United States District Court, N.D. California
ROBERT L. STEINBERG, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
PROVIDENT FUNDING ASSOCIATES, L.P., Defendant.
SCHEDULING ORDER
JON S.
TIGAR United States District Judge.
The
Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule
16-10:
-
Event
|
Deadline
|
Mediation deadline (ECF No. 39)
|
September 15, 2016
|
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings
|
October 7, 2016
|
Deadline to file class certification motion
|
April 21, 2017
|
Class certification opposition
|
May 19, 2017
|
Class certification reply
|
June 2, 2017
|
Hearing on class certification motion
|
June 22, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
|
Fact discovery cut-off
|
March 24, 2017
|
Expert disclosures
|
July 28, 2017
|
Expert rebuttal
|
August 25, 2017
|
Expert discovery cut-off
|
September 29, 2017
|
Deadline to file dispositive motions
|
September 29, 2017
|
Pretrial conference statement due
|
December 22, 2017
|
Pretrial conference
|
January 5, 2018
|
Trial
|
January 29, 2018
|
Estimate of trial length (in days)
|
Eight
|
This
case will be tried to a jury.[1]
The
Court expresses no view now as to the timing of
Provident’s anticipated summary judgment motion.
See ECF No. 44 at 4.
Counsel
may not modify these dates without leave of court. The
parties shall comply with the Court’s standing orders,
which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The
parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery,
compel discovery, hire counsel, retain experts, and manage
their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a
timely manner and appear at trial on the noticed and
scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their calendars to
accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or
associate in counsel who can.
Trial
dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests
for continuance are disfavored. The Court will not consider
any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-controlled
witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above
trial date as good cause to grant a continuance. The Court
will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as
good cause to grant a continuance.
The
Case Management Conference currently scheduled for August 10,
2016 is vacated.
IT IS
SO ORDERED.
---------
Notes:
[1] In
the parties’ Joint Case Management Statement, Provident
contends that “Plaintiffs are not entitled to a jury
trial under the terms of the governing loan
agreements.” ECF No. 44 at 7. The ...