Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Steinberg v. Provident Funding Associates L.P.

United States District Court, N.D. California

July 28, 2016

ROBERT L. STEINBERG, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
PROVIDENT FUNDING ASSOCIATES, L.P., Defendant.

          SCHEDULING ORDER

          JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge.

         The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

Event

Deadline

Mediation deadline (ECF No. 39)

September 15, 2016

Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

October 7, 2016

Deadline to file class certification motion

April 21, 2017

Class certification opposition

May 19, 2017

Class certification reply

June 2, 2017

Hearing on class certification motion

June 22, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.

Fact discovery cut-off

March 24, 2017

Expert disclosures

July 28, 2017

Expert rebuttal

August 25, 2017

Expert discovery cut-off

September 29, 2017

Deadline to file dispositive motions

September 29, 2017

Pretrial conference statement due

December 22, 2017

Pretrial conference

January 5, 2018

Trial

January 29, 2018

Estimate of trial length (in days)

Eight

         This case will be tried to a jury.[1]

         The Court expresses no view now as to the timing of Provident’s anticipated summary judgment motion. See ECF No. 44 at 4.

         Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.

         The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

         Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause to grant a continuance.

         The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for August 10, 2016 is vacated.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.

---------

Notes:

[1] In the parties’ Joint Case Management Statement, Provident contends that “Plaintiffs are not entitled to a jury trial under the terms of the governing loan agreements.” ECF No. 44 at 7. The ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.