United States District Court, N.D. California
RAYMOND J. MANZANILLO, Plaintiff,
v.
GREGORY D. LEWIS, et al., Defendants.
Raymond J. Manzanillo, Plaintiff, represented by Aryeh
Matthew Hersher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Francis J. Ortman, III,
Seyfarth Shaw LLP, James Edward Barolo, Seyfarth Shaw LLP,
Jason Michael Allen, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Michael Anderson
Wahlander, Seyfarth Shaw LLP & Selyn Hong, Seyfarth Shaw LLP.
Gregory D. Lewis, Defendant, represented by Michael James
Quinn, California State Attorney General's Office &
Michael Lee Huggins, California Attorney General's
Office.
K.
McGuyer, Defendant, represented by Michael James Quinn,
California State Attorney General's Office & Michael Lee
Huggins, California Attorney General's Office.
T. A.
Wood, Defendant, represented by Michael James Quinn,
California State Attorney General's Office & Michael Lee
Huggins, California Attorney General's Office.
J.
Hallock, Defendant, represented by Michael James Quinn,
California State Attorney General's Office & Michael Lee
Huggins, California Attorney General's Office.
N.
Brown, Defendant, represented by William Lee McCaslin,
McNamara Law Firm & Peter Jon Hirsig, McNamara Law Firm.
Matthew Cate, Defendant, represented by Michael James Quinn,
California State Attorney General's Office & Michael Lee
Huggins, California Attorney General's Office.
California Office of the Inspector General, Interested Party,
represented by James Casey Spurling, Office of the Inspector
General.
STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
JON S.
TIGAR, District Judge.
Plaintiff
Raymond Manzanillo ("Plaintiff") and Defendants N.
Brown, Gregory D. Lewis, J. Hallock, K. McGuyer, Matthew
Cate, and T.A. Wood ("Defendants") (collectively
the "Parties") by and through their counsel hereby
stipulate and jointly request the Court to extend certain
deadlines in the Scheduling Order issued on May 18, 2016
(Dkt. No. 190).
As
noted in the Parties' previous request for leave to take
certain depositions after the current fact discovery cut-off
(Dkt. No. 196), the Parties intend to conduct a site visit of
facilities at Pelican Bay State Prison and to depose
Defendant Kurt McGuyer, Correctional Lieutenant John Diggle,
Correctional Sergeant B. Grenert, and a representative of the
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
("CDCR") under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
30(b)(6). Due to the Parties' schedules and the
availability of the intended deponents, the Parties cannot
complete those depositions or the site visit before the
current fact discovery cut-off of August 5, 2016.
Accordingly, the Parties request that the Court extend the
fact discovery cut-off by approximately thirty (30) days, to
September 2, 2016.
Additionally,
because the information obtained through those depositions
and the site visit will likely be relevant for experts
analyzing issues in this case, the Parties request that the
Court extend the deadlines for expert disclosures, rebuttal
disclosures, and expert discovery by approximately fourteen
(14) days, to September 9, 30, and October 14, respectively.
Accordingly,
the Parties propose ...