Martinez v. Anning-Johnson Co.
United States District Court, C.D. California
August 3, 2016
SANTOS A. MARTINEZ and RAMON FLORES VALDEZ on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and the general public, Plaintiffs,
v.
ANNING-JOHNSON COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. ENRIQUE OROZCO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
ANNING-JOHNSON COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. CESAR OROZCO aka JESUS CHAVEZ, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated non-exempt former and current employees, Plaintiffs,
v.
ANNING-JOHNSON COMPANY, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendants.
JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS
ACTION/COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT AND AWARDING
ATTORNEYS' FEES, COSTS, AND ENHANCEMENT AWARDS
Hon.
George H. King, United States District Judge.
Santos
Martinez, Ramon Flores-Valdez, Enrique Orozco, and Cesar
Orozco, a/k/a Jesus Chavez (collectively "Plaintiffs,
" "Named Plaintiffs, " or "Class
Representatives") and Arming-Johnson Company
("Defendant" or "AJC") have reached a
settlement of a putative class action/collective action.
On
January 20, 2016, this Court: (1) preliminarily certified a
class for settlement purposes; (2) preliminarily certified a
collective class under the Fair Labor Standards Act
("FLSA"); (3) preliminarily approved the terms of
the proposed class action/collective action Settlement; and
(4) authorized notice to the Settlement Class and Settlement
Collective Class of the terms of the proposed Settlement.
Having completed the process of providing notice to the
Settlement Class and the Settlement Collective Class, and no
objectors having come forward, Plaintiffs move for final
approval of a class action and collective action settlement
of the claims asserted against Defendant in this action,
memorialized in the Class Action, Collective Action, And
Representative Action Settlement Agreement (Amended, And As
Further Amended January 2016) ("Settlement
Agreement" or "Agreement"). Capitalized terms
in this Order shall have the same meaning as in the
Settlement Agreement unless otherwise stated.
After
reviewing the Settlement Agreement, Plaintiffs' Unopposed
Motion for Final Approval, Plaintiffs' Motion for
Attorneys' Fees and Costs, Settlement Administration
Costs, and Enhancement Awards, and other related documents,
and having heard the argument of counsel for the respective
Parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Court has jurisdiction over the Parties to this
action, including all members of the Final Settlement Class
and Settlement Collective Class as defined in the Settlement
Agreement.
2. The Court finds, for purposes of settlement only, that the
proposed Final Settlement Class satisfies the applicable
standards for certification under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 23. The requirements of Rule 23(a) are satisfied
because the Final Settlement Class is so numerous that
joinder of all Final Settlement Class members is
impracticable, there are questions of law or fact common to
the Final Settlement Class, the claims of Plaintiffs are
typical of the claims of the Final Settlement Class, and
Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interest of
the Final Settlement Class. The requirements of Rule 23(b)(3)
are satisfied because questions of law or fact common to
Final Settlement Class Members predominate over any questions
affecting only individual Final Settlement Class Members, and
the class action device is superior to other available
methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating this
controversy. Accordingly, solely for purposes of effectuating
this Settlement, the Court hereby certifies the Final
Settlement Class.
3. The Court finds that the proposed Settlement Collective
Class satisfies the applicable standards for certification of
a collective action under the FLSA in that members of the
Settlement Collective Class are similarly situated.
Accordingly, solely for purposes of effectuating this
Settlement, the Court hereby certifies the Settlement
Collective Class.
4. The Court hereby grants final approval of the Settlement
Agreement as it meets the criteria for final settlement
approval. The Settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable;
appears to be the product of arm's-length and informed
negotiations; and treats all Final Settlement Class Members
and Settlement Collective Class Members fairly.
5. The Class Notice approved by the Court was provided by
First Class direct mail to the last-known address of each of
the individuals identified as Settlement Class Members (the
Class Notice included an FLSA Opt-In Form for those
individuals who were also Potential Settlement Collective
Class Members), after first processing such addresses through
the U.S. Postal Service change-of-address database. Follow-up
efforts were made to send the Class Notice to those
individuals whose original Class Notices were returned as
undeliverable. The Class Notice adequately described all of
the relevant and necessary parts of the proposed Settlement
Agreement, the right of Potential Settlement Collective Class
Members to opt in to the FLSA portion of the Settlement and
the procedures for doing so, the request for service payments
to the Class Representatives and for reimbursement to the
Settlement Administrator, and Settlement Class Counsel's
request for an award of attorneys' fees and costs.
6. The Court has determined that the Notice given to the
Settlement Class and Settlement Collective Class fully and
accurately informed the Settlement Class and Settlement
Collective Class of all material elements of the proposed
Settlement, constituted the best practicable notice, and
fully meets the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 23, the FLSA, and all applicable constitutional
requirements.
7. There were no requests for exclusion from the Settlement.
The names of the 197 Final Settlement Class Members
(including Named Plaintiffs) have been filed with the Court
in conjunction with Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for
Final Approval. The Court hereby orders that all Final
Settlement Class Members have released all claims or causes
of action settled under the terms of Paragraph 81 of the
Settlement Agreement. All Final Settlement Class Members are
hereby forever barred and enjoined from commencing or
prosecuting any of the claims, either directly,
representatively, or in any other capacity, that are released
by Paragraph 81 of the Settlement Agreement.
8. Having receiving no objections, and the time for
submitting such objections having passed, the Court finds
that no valid objections have been submitted and no
objections will be considered by the Court. Final Settlement
Class Members and Settlement Collective Class Members who did
not timely object to the Settlement set forth in the
Settlement Agreement are barred from prosecuting or pursuing
any appeal of this Order.
9. A total of 83 individuals validly and timely opted-in to
the Settlement Collective Class, including the Named
Plaintiffs. A total of three individuals submitted Opt-In
Forms that were dated prior to or on the Bar Date, but
postmarked after the Bar Date of April 22, 2016. These three
individuals are: Herman Hoyos; Jonathan Andrew O'Brien;
and Martin R. Enriquez Penaran. All three of these
late-postmarked Opt-In Forms were post-marked within 14 days
after the Bar Date. The Parties do not object to the
inclusion of these three individuals within the Settlement
Collective Class notwithstanding their late-postmarked Opt-In
Forms. No prejudice will result from the inclusion of these
individuals in the Settlement Collective Class and their
inclusion in the Settlement Collective Class will not delay
the conclusion of this matter. Accordingly, the Court deems
these three individuals (i.e., Herman Hoyos; Jonathan Andrew
O'Brien; and Martin R. Enriquez Penaran) to be included
in the Settlement Collective Class notwithstanding their
belated submission of the required Opt-In Form. This results
in a total of 86 individuals in the Settlement Collective
Class (including Named Plaintiffs). The names of these
individuals and the written consent by such individuals to
join this action were filed with the Court in conjunction
with Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Final Approval.
10. The Court hereby orders that all Settlement Collective
Class Members have released all claims or causes of action
settled under the terms of Paragraph 82 of the Settlement
Agreement (this release is in addition to the release under
Paragraph 81 of the Settlement Agreement to which such
individuals are also bound). All Settlement Collective Class
Members are hereby forever barred and enjoined from
commencing or prosecuting any of the claims, either ...